WHICH TRADITIONS WOULD JESUS OBSERVE?
By Bill Blue
Jesus would condemn the “teaching as doctrines the commandments of men” (Matt. 15:9). In Matthew 15, Jesus criticized the scribes and Pharisees for binding two traditions found no where in the Scriptures. We can we be guilty of the same conduct today.
In Jesus’ day, Jews were divided into different sects, each with their own unique combination of beliefs. They were known as the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots. (One example in the difference in beliefs is that the Pharisees believed in the resurrection from the dead, while the Sadducees did not. Matt. 22:23-32; Acts 23:6-8). Today, Christianity has its own sects, or “faiths,” each with its own unique combination of beliefs and practices and each with its own name, such as Baptist, Catholic, Episcopalian, Greek Orthodox, Lutheran, Methodist, Mormon, Presbyterian, Seventh Day Adventist, etc.
Beliefs, practices, and traditions which are not found in the Bible either add to or take from God’s word in violation of Jesus’ own teaching (Rev. 22:18-19). Consider two examples from Matthew 15. The Scriptures contained no requirement that men wash their hands before eating, yet the Pharisees declared the disciples’ failure to wash a “transgression,” essentially creating a new commandment (Matt. 15:1-9). Men bind new beliefs today. Some faiths teach that an infant that dies before baptism does not go to heaven even though there is neither a command to baptize infants, nor an example of infants being baptized found in the Bible. The Bible actually says that belief, something an infant is incapable of, is a prerequisite to baptism (Acts 8:36-37).
In Matthew 15, the Pharisees also created an exception to God’s law by excusing a son’s obligation to care for his parents if he donated a gift to the temple; thus taking from God’s word (Matt. 15:6). Men make the same mistakes today. The Bible has consistently condemned homosexuality (Lev. 18:22; Lev. 20:13; Rom. 1:26-27; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; 1 Tim. 1:10), yet nearly 2000 years after Christ’s death, some faiths are now beginning to accept homosexuals as preachers. Jesus would not let political correctness determine which acts are sinful.
In Matthew 15, Jesus did not condemn the washing of one’s hand before eating, but rather the presumptuous creation of a new commandment. Similarly, Jesus was not opposed to people donating gifts to the temple, but the arrogant belief that a man could excuse someone from obeying God’s law to care for one’s own family, essentially making God’s law of “no effect” (Matt. 15:6; Mark 7:10), by “laying [it] aside,” and “reject[ing] the commandment of God” (Mark 7:8-9).
Jesus also criticized the Pharisees for going beyond God’s law when they drew distinctions between the types of oaths one could swear to (Matt. 23:16-22). Isn’t this similar to “ranking” sins when God has not, or classifying God’s commands as those essential to salvation and others not?
Jesus refused to obey traditions that were inconsistent with the letter and intent of the Scriptures. In Matthew 12, Jesus refused to honor the traditions of the elders with respect to the Sabbath in two different contexts: the plucking of grain and healing (Matt. 12:1-14). In both instances, the tradition sought to restrict activities where God’s law did not (Matt. 12:7, 12).
Jesus would adhere only to the doctrine, teachings, and traditions found in the New Testament. We have observed in earlier articles that Jesus would answer religious questions with Bible answers (WWJD no. 2; see also Matt. 4:1-10), and because He sent the Holy Spirit to His Apostles to divinely inspire them with all truth and bring to their remembrance the things He said and did in their presence (John 14:26, 16:13), the Apostles could be trusted to declare God’s will accurately (Matt. 16:19; see also WWJD no. 4). Thus, Jesus would have us follow Apostolic traditions (1 Cor. 11:2; 2 Thess. 3:6), but not the traditions of men which contradict the Bible (Col. 2:8).
Jesus says that the teachers and followers of commandments and traditions not found in the Bible are blind (Matt. 15:14). They “transgress the commandment of God” (Matt. 15:3), and worship Him “in vain” (Matt. 15:9).
In Matthew 15:8-9, Jesus quotes the prophet Isaiah, “These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.” The whole idea behind emphasizing WWJD (“What Would Jesus Do?”) is to draw nearer to Christ by becoming more Christ-like. However, Jesus says we cannot draw nearer to Him by moving farther from God’s word.
By Bill Blue
Jesus would condemn the “teaching as doctrines the commandments of men” (Matt. 15:9). In Matthew 15, Jesus criticized the scribes and Pharisees for binding two traditions found no where in the Scriptures. We can we be guilty of the same conduct today.
In Jesus’ day, Jews were divided into different sects, each with their own unique combination of beliefs. They were known as the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots. (One example in the difference in beliefs is that the Pharisees believed in the resurrection from the dead, while the Sadducees did not. Matt. 22:23-32; Acts 23:6-8). Today, Christianity has its own sects, or “faiths,” each with its own unique combination of beliefs and practices and each with its own name, such as Baptist, Catholic, Episcopalian, Greek Orthodox, Lutheran, Methodist, Mormon, Presbyterian, Seventh Day Adventist, etc.
Beliefs, practices, and traditions which are not found in the Bible either add to or take from God’s word in violation of Jesus’ own teaching (Rev. 22:18-19). Consider two examples from Matthew 15. The Scriptures contained no requirement that men wash their hands before eating, yet the Pharisees declared the disciples’ failure to wash a “transgression,” essentially creating a new commandment (Matt. 15:1-9). Men bind new beliefs today. Some faiths teach that an infant that dies before baptism does not go to heaven even though there is neither a command to baptize infants, nor an example of infants being baptized found in the Bible. The Bible actually says that belief, something an infant is incapable of, is a prerequisite to baptism (Acts 8:36-37).
In Matthew 15, the Pharisees also created an exception to God’s law by excusing a son’s obligation to care for his parents if he donated a gift to the temple; thus taking from God’s word (Matt. 15:6). Men make the same mistakes today. The Bible has consistently condemned homosexuality (Lev. 18:22; Lev. 20:13; Rom. 1:26-27; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; 1 Tim. 1:10), yet nearly 2000 years after Christ’s death, some faiths are now beginning to accept homosexuals as preachers. Jesus would not let political correctness determine which acts are sinful.
In Matthew 15, Jesus did not condemn the washing of one’s hand before eating, but rather the presumptuous creation of a new commandment. Similarly, Jesus was not opposed to people donating gifts to the temple, but the arrogant belief that a man could excuse someone from obeying God’s law to care for one’s own family, essentially making God’s law of “no effect” (Matt. 15:6; Mark 7:10), by “laying [it] aside,” and “reject[ing] the commandment of God” (Mark 7:8-9).
Jesus also criticized the Pharisees for going beyond God’s law when they drew distinctions between the types of oaths one could swear to (Matt. 23:16-22). Isn’t this similar to “ranking” sins when God has not, or classifying God’s commands as those essential to salvation and others not?
Jesus refused to obey traditions that were inconsistent with the letter and intent of the Scriptures. In Matthew 12, Jesus refused to honor the traditions of the elders with respect to the Sabbath in two different contexts: the plucking of grain and healing (Matt. 12:1-14). In both instances, the tradition sought to restrict activities where God’s law did not (Matt. 12:7, 12).
Jesus would adhere only to the doctrine, teachings, and traditions found in the New Testament. We have observed in earlier articles that Jesus would answer religious questions with Bible answers (WWJD no. 2; see also Matt. 4:1-10), and because He sent the Holy Spirit to His Apostles to divinely inspire them with all truth and bring to their remembrance the things He said and did in their presence (John 14:26, 16:13), the Apostles could be trusted to declare God’s will accurately (Matt. 16:19; see also WWJD no. 4). Thus, Jesus would have us follow Apostolic traditions (1 Cor. 11:2; 2 Thess. 3:6), but not the traditions of men which contradict the Bible (Col. 2:8).
Jesus says that the teachers and followers of commandments and traditions not found in the Bible are blind (Matt. 15:14). They “transgress the commandment of God” (Matt. 15:3), and worship Him “in vain” (Matt. 15:9).
In Matthew 15:8-9, Jesus quotes the prophet Isaiah, “These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.” The whole idea behind emphasizing WWJD (“What Would Jesus Do?”) is to draw nearer to Christ by becoming more Christ-like. However, Jesus says we cannot draw nearer to Him by moving farther from God’s word.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment